BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Maxwell Chambers - ECPv6.2.8.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.maxwellchambers.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Maxwell Chambers
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Singapore
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
TZNAME:+08
DTSTART:20240101T000000
END:STANDARD
TZID:Asia/Jakarta
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0700
TZOFFSETTO:+0700
TZNAME:WIB
DTSTART:20240101T000000
END:STANDARD
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20240101T000000
END:STANDARD
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
TZID:Asia/Kolkata
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0530
TZOFFSETTO:+0530
TZNAME:IST
DTSTART:20250101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240829T170000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240829T190000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214341
CREATED:20240516T065902Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240524T023823Z
UID:10000293-1724950800-1724958000@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:India Rising – Risk Management in a Globalised India
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.singaporeconventionweek.sg/sc-weeks-events.html#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SC-Week.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240829T180000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240829T203000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214342
CREATED:20240808T081327Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240808T081327Z
UID:10000334-1724954400-1724963400@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Legal Counsel Summit 2024
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://scca.glueup.com/event/legal-counsel-summit-2024-109887/#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Asia Pacific,Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/SCCA-Featured-Image.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240829T183000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240829T210000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214342
CREATED:20240516T070252Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240815T102534Z
UID:10000295-1724956200-1724965200@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:SG VYAP: Screening of "The Tribunal" and Panel Discussion on ISDS
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.singaporeconventionweek.sg/sc-weeks-events.html#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SC-Week.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T083000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T103000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214342
CREATED:20240530T030730Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240530T030730Z
UID:10000198-1725006600-1725013800@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Coffee\, Code & Conflict: ICDR’s Adventures in Tech Disputes
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.singaporeconventionweek.sg/sc-weeks-events.html#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SC-Week.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T093000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T120000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214342
CREATED:20240516T072558Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240516T072558Z
UID:10000296-1725010200-1725019200@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Navigating the Future of Mediation
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.singaporeconventionweek.sg/sc-weeks-events.html#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SC-Week.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T120000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T130000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214343
CREATED:20240823T030201Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240823T030201Z
UID:10000360-1725019200-1725022800@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Navigating the Maze: Challenges in Concurrent Proceedings
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/VTFM52C#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SC-Week.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T123000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T140000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214343
CREATED:20240530T030927Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240530T030927Z
UID:10000199-1725021000-1725026400@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Investor State Mediation: Changing the Mindset
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.singaporeconventionweek.sg/sc-weeks-events.html#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SC-Week.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T133000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T183000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214343
CREATED:20240516T072714Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240516T072714Z
UID:10000297-1725024600-1725042600@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Celebrating 30 Years of the International Arbitration Act – Past\, Present\, Future
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.singaporeconventionweek.sg/sc-weeks-events.html#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SC-Week.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T140000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T173000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214343
CREATED:20240516T073026Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240516T073026Z
UID:10000298-1725026400-1725039000@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Ecumene Discussion Club & ICLRC Event
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.singaporeconventionweek.sg/sc-weeks-events.html#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SC-Week.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T143000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T173000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214344
CREATED:20240516T073146Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240524T024544Z
UID:10000299-1725028200-1725039000@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Debate on New Mediation Guidelines
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.singaporeconventionweek.sg/sc-weeks-events.html#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SC-Week.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T163000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240830T190000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214344
CREATED:20240516T073316Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240516T073316Z
UID:10000300-1725035400-1725044400@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:The Art and Science of Arbitral Tribunal Composition
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.singaporeconventionweek.sg/sc-weeks-events.html#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SC-Week.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Jakarta:20240903T083000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Jakarta:20240903T170000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214344
CREATED:20240711T035418Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240711T035418Z
UID:10000323-1725352200-1725382800@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:ICC Institute of World Business Law Advanced Training on Oral Advocacy
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://2go.iccwbo.org/icc-institute-of-world-business-law-advanced-training-on-oral-advocacy.html#msdynttrid=8ozmSmncRAWS7ZFTOFIdCDr075lVEQKgNGGMrC5QasA#new_tab
LOCATION:Indonesia\, Indonesia
CATEGORIES:Asia Pacific,Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ICC-Institute-of-World-Business-Law-ICC-Indonesia.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20240904T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20240904T210000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214345
CREATED:20240618T015848Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240808T023710Z
UID:10000313-1725440400-1725483600@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Delos GAP Symposium 2024
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://delosdr.org/my-events/delos-gap-symposium-2024-corruption-international-arbitration/#new_tab
LOCATION:Paris\, France
CATEGORIES:Outside of Asia-Pacific,Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Events-Featured-Image.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240917T170000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20240917T183000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214345
CREATED:20240903T020054Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240905T015058Z
UID:10000364-1726592400-1726597800@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:SIArb Pre-AGM Seminar 2024
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdfIXjpZqIG9rQdi2gUQabj-Z4LQwXZVu3SAuZL4g87yW5QEA/viewform#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Asia Pacific,Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/SIArb-1.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20241009T173000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20241009T203000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214345
CREATED:20240529T011038Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241015T055814Z
UID:10000196-1728495000-1728505800@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:SIArb Annual Lecture 2024
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.linkedin.com/company/siarb1981/
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SIArb.png
ORGANIZER;CN="Singapore Institute of Arbitrators":MAILTO:secretariat@siarb.org.sg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20241010T143000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20241010T183000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214345
CREATED:20240926T092612Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240926T092612Z
UID:10000374-1728570600-1728585000@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:International Law Association (Singapore Branch) Symposium: The Growing Access to International Law
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://cil.nus.edu.sg/event/the-growing-access-to-international-law/#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/International-Law-Association-Singapore-Branch.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20241106T170000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20241106T183000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214346
CREATED:20240923T074026Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241011T014218Z
UID:10000368-1730912400-1730917800@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Asian Arbitration Lecture 2024: Regulating AI in International Arbitration
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://site.smu.edu.sg/herbert-smith-freehills-smu-asian-arbitration-lecture-2024#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Herbert-Smith-Freehills.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20241106T170000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20241106T193000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214346
CREATED:20241011T011837Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241011T031459Z
UID:10000377-1730912400-1730921400@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:SIAC-CIArb Debate 2024
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/event/siac-ciarb-debate-2024/
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events,Supported Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SIAC-Feature-Image-1.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Jakarta:20241114T083000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Jakarta:20241114T190000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214346
CREATED:20241105T011044Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241105T011105Z
UID:10000411-1731573000-1731610800@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:2024 Seoul Summit on Commercial Dispute Resolution in China
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://annualreport.bjac.org.cn/m/en?year=2024&e=101#new_tab
LOCATION:Seoul\, South Korea\, Seoul\, Korea\, Republic of
CATEGORIES:Asia Pacific,Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Events-Featured-Image-1.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20241126T173000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20241126T203000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214346
CREATED:20241015T060556Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241015T060556Z
UID:10000381-1732642200-1732653000@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:SIArb Annual Debate 2024
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://siarb.org.sg/events/upcoming-events/icalrepeat.detail/2024/11/26/483/-/in-person-siarb-annual-debate-2024-this-house-believes-that-multi-tiered-dispute-resolution-clauses-hinder-the-finality-of-disputes-26-november-2024-5#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SIArb.png
ORGANIZER;CN="Singapore Institute of Arbitrators":MAILTO:secretariat@siarb.org.sg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20241205T173000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20241205T190000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214347
CREATED:20240815T182527Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241025T090739Z
UID:10000343-1733419800-1733425200@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:SIAC Academy Annual Lecture
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://siac.org.sg/event/siac-academy-annual-lecture-2024#new_tab
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events,Workshop
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SIAC-Feature-Image.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250116T170000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250116T193000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214347
CREATED:20250110T034236Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250110T050606Z
UID:10000466-1737046800-1737055800@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:One Essex Court Seminar
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://oeclaw.co.uk/pages/siac-in-the-new-year#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ONE-ESSEX-COURT-logo.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250123T190000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250123T203000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214347
CREATED:20250110T031741Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250117T100306Z
UID:10000461-1737658800-1737664200@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Young ICCA-SG VYAP Event on "Best Practices in International Arbitration for Junior Lawyers
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.tickettailor.com/events/singaporevyap/1513094#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/SG-VYAP-logo.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250130
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250201
DTSTAMP:20260610T214347
CREATED:20250122T030427Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250124T084721Z
UID:10000482-1738195200-1738367999@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:ITechLaw 2025 International India Conference
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.itechlaw.org/event/2025-india-conference/#new_tab
LOCATION:India\, India
CATEGORIES:Asia Pacific,Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Events-Featured-Image-2.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20250206T180000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20250206T200000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214348
CREATED:20250203T083809Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250203T085038Z
UID:10000492-1738864800-1738872000@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:ACC India: ADR Trends and How to Optimize the ADR Process Domestically and Internationally
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://web.cvent.com/event/6a7b77ac-8dd1-4bd0-8e19-993fab085289/summary#new_tab
LOCATION:Chennai\, India\, India
CATEGORIES:Asia Pacific,Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Events-Featured-Image-2.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20250207T163000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20250207T193000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214348
CREATED:20250203T090601Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250203T090601Z
UID:10000494-1738945800-1738956600@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Enhancing Efficiency in Institutional Arbitration
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=Sr4ytrekSkSGswWGmOmq-54LsO7uShFHm8pCacjO7FxURDNQWTY0S0xaQVJEWUUzVzFETDVLU0o4Qi4u&route=shorturl#new_tab
LOCATION:Chennai\, India\, India
CATEGORIES:Asia Pacific,Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Events-Featured-Image-4.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250218T170000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250218T183000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214348
CREATED:20250203T093513Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250203T093513Z
UID:10000472-1739898000-1739903400@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:The International Arbitrator\, Disclosure and Liability Issues: Is it time for one Single Standard?
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://cil.nus.edu.sg/event/the-international-arbitrator-disclosure-and-liability-issues-is-it-time-for-one-single-standard/#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Events-Featured-Image-5.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250225T173000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250225T193000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214348
CREATED:20250109T012729Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250110T020743Z
UID:10000458-1740504600-1740511800@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:SIArb Annual Seminar 2025 - Developments in Singapore Arbitration
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.siarb.org.sg/events/upcoming-events/icalrepeat.detail/2025/02/25/487/-/siarb-annual-seminar-2025-developments-in-singapore-arbitration#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Seminar,Singapore Events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/SIArb-1.png
ORGANIZER;CN="Singapore Institute of Arbitrators":MAILTO:secretariat@siarb.org.sg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250305T120000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250305T133000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214349
CREATED:20250120T090436Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250210T074804Z
UID:10000479-1741176000-1741181400@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Beyond the Black Box: Gen-AI for Arbitrators
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/event/beyond-the-black-box-gen-ai-for-arbitrators/
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Happenings by Maxwell Chambers,Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Maxwell-Chambers.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250305T163000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Singapore:20250305T180000
DTSTAMP:20260610T214349
CREATED:20250228T081831Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250228T081831Z
UID:10000517-1741192200-1741197600@www.maxwellchambers.com
SUMMARY:Embracing the Era of Artificial Intelligence in International Arbitration
DESCRIPTION:Event Details		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Maxwell Conversations: Managing Public Policy | 29 August 2024		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n				\n				\n							Maxwell Conversations features leading personalities at the top of the international dispute resolution industry. These events seek to challenge assumptions with a deeper examination of the issues. Synposis  Public policy is an important element in determining the arbitrability of a dispute\, and also a ground on which an award may be annulled or refused enforcement. It has often been said that the public policy should be construed narrowly in keeping with the pro-arbitration policy of the New York Convention or the UNCITRAL Model Law. Held as part of Singapore Convention Week\, this session of Maxwell Conversations focused on the crucial role of public policy in international arbitration. The discussion highlighted how public policy influences the arbitrability of disputes and serves as grounds for annulling or refusing the enforcement of an award. While it is commonly understood that public policy should be interpreted narrowly\, aligning with the pro-arbitration stance of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law\, the event also shed light on less frequently discussed topics. The panel explored the importance of arbitrator independence and seat court review\, which are considered part of the “international public policy” of arbitration. This was contrasted with how courts may enforce annulled awards if they deem the annulment contrary to their own national public policy\, touching on issues like crime\, corruption\, or sovereignty. The discussion raised important questions about whether international and national public policies are opposing forces or if enforcing courts should consider multiple layers of public policy\, including the public policies of the governing law\, the seat of arbitration\, and how to navigate conflicts between these different frameworks. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n				\n				\n							The books referenced by Michael at the start of the session are: \n\nThe Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention\, Second Edition by Anton G. Maurer\nICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention\, Second Edition\nGuide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards\, New York 1958 by the UNCITRAL Secretariat\n\nAdditional reference materials include: \n\nRe-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards” written by Darius Chan and Elias Ngai of the Singapore Management University in the Journal of International Arbitration\n						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Q&A from the Lecture:		\n				\n				\n				\n							Q1: What are the potential challenges in the future for issuing arbitral awards? Are there any changes in environment or technology that may mitigate or worsen these challenges? \nQ2: What aspects of arbitration are ready for AI? \nQ3: What do you think are the key issues that need to be considered when using technology? \nQ4: About diversity\, I notice that the ICC now has an almost 50/50 male/female mix. Is this too fast and too artificial? \nQ5: For operating with ICC arbitration\, since the publishing of the ICC arbitration rules 2021 in the year of 2021\, which part of the arbitration rules 2021 would ICC suggest multi-national companies\, future expert witnesses\, future party representatives and future arbitrators to pay attention to as per ICC’s observation so far? \nQ6: What would ICC like expert witnesses\, party representatives\, and arbitrators to do (and prepare themselves) in order to operate ICC arbitration in line with ICC’s vision?  						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Watch the full recorded session below:		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n					\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										29 August 2024\, Thursday \n									\n								\n											\n													\n										8.00 am – 9:30 am (GMT+8)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n					\n							\n											\n													\n										Singapore\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Organiser: Maxwell Chambers\n									\n								\n											\n													\n										Format: Hybrid (In-person at Maxwell Chambers\, Online over Zoom)\n									\n						\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																\n															\n															\n				\n				\n				\n					\n			\n							\n								\n							\n						\n				\n					CategoryFee (SGD)				\n			\n					\n					\n				\n			YouTube Livestreaming TicketFreeZoom Webinar Ticket$30*		\n					\n		\n				\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Speakers		\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Dr Michael Hwang		\n				\n				\n				\n							Dr Michael Hwang S.C. currently practises as an international arbitrator based in Singapore with a selective practice as Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court of Singapore. He served as the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts from 2010 – 2018.   Dr Hwang’s other past appointments include: Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore; Singapore’s Non-Resident Ambassador to Switzerland and Argentina; President of the Law Society of Singapore; Commissioner of the United Nations Compensation Commission; Vice Chairman of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration (ICCA); and a Visiting (and later Adjunct) Professor of the National University of Singapore. He was educated at undergraduate and postgraduate levels at Oxford University\, where he won the Gordon Warter Scholarship from Pembroke College by open competitive examination. He has been conferred an Honorary LLD by the University of Sydney. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Jessica Fei		\n				\n				\n				\n							Jessica is a widely recognized leading international arbitration and dispute resolution specialist with close to 30 years’ experience working with international arbitration institutions and leading firms.  Constantly ranked and recommended by leading legal media including Chambers\, WWL\, Legal 500\, and ALB\, Jessica is one of the very few leading international arbitration practitioners (acting as counsel and arbitrator)  with dual qualifications (China and New York) as well as extensive cross-border dispute resolution experience between Chinese/Asian and Western parties. Jessica focuses her practice on international arbitration\, litigation and alternative disputes resolution. She sits regularly as arbitrator in commercial arbitration cases\, and is listed on the international arbitrator panels of the SIAC\, HKIAC\, CIETAC\, ICDR/AAA\, AIAC\, KCAB\, CEAC etc. Jessica is a court member of SIAC Court of Arbitration\, a member of the International/ Asia Advisory Committee of the AAA/ICDR\, a member of the CEAC Advisory Board\, VP of the UIA Litigation Committee and China Chapter Chair of NYSBA International Section. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Sae Youn Kim		\n				\n				\n				\n							Sae Youn Kim is a partner of the International Arbitration & Cross-Border Litigation Practice of Kim & Chang. Ms. Kim practices primarily in the areas of international litigation and arbitration with an emphasis on commercial and international law. Before joining Kim & Chang\, she served as a judge at various Korean district courts\, and practiced as a key member in major Korean law firms. Ms. Kim also sits as an arbitrator. Her expertise in international dispute resolution has been recognized by the variety of roles she holds and held in various institutions\, including but not limited to a Commissioner of the Korea Trade Commission\, a Vice-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association\, a Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Committee of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association\, and a member of the ICC Court. She is regularly selected as leading lawyer by publications such as Chambers and Partners\, Who’s Who Legal\, Legal 500\, and Asian Legal Business. Ms. Kim received an LL.M. from Duke University Law School in 2007\, and her LL.B. from Seoul National University College of Law in 1991. She graduated the Judicial Training and Research Institute by the Supreme Court of Korea in 1994. She speaks and practices in both Korean and English. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Vijayendra Pratap Singh		\n				\n				\n				\n							With over 20 years of experience\, Vijayendra Pratap Singh heads the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in Delhi. Vijayendra represents clients in international\, commercial and domestic arbitrations; corporate and commercial litigation; regulatory practices and securities law. He has advised various government departments\, such as the Department of Economic Affairs\, Ministry of Finance; Securities and Exchange Board of India; Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs\, etc.\, on the de-criminalisation of various Statutes and has been involved in various policy making initiatives of the Government of India. Vijayendra’s expertise span domestic and international arbitration\, as well as disputes in various fora in India\, ranging from shareholder disputes to corporate actions. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Lawrence Teh (Moderator)		\n				\n				\n				\n							Lawrence Teh is the Global Co-Head of Dentons’ International Arbitration practice and a senior partner in Dentons Rodyk’s Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group. He is Co-Head of Dentons Rodyk’s International Arbitration and Shipping practice groups. He has particular experience in handling commercial disputes including those of international trade and commodities\, maritime and aviation\, banking and financial services\, onshore and offshore construction\, mergers\, acquisitions\, joint ventures and other investments\, and insurance. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Attendance Policy		\n				\n				\n				\n							Participants who wish to obtain CPD Points are reminded that they must comply strictly with the Attendance Policy set out in the CPD Guidelines. For participants attending the face-to-face activity\, this includes signing in on arrival and signing out at the conclusion of the activity in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being absent from the activity for more than 15 minutes. For those participating via the webinar\, this includes logging in at the start of the webinar and logging out at the conclusion of the webinar in the manner required by the organiser\, and not being away from the activity for more than 15 minutes. Participants who do not comply with the Attendance Policy will not be able to obtain CPD Points for attending the activity. Please refer to https://www.silecpdcentre.sg for more information. Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution Training Category: General 						\n				\n					\n		\n				\n			\n								\n				\n			Earn 1 Public CPD Point		\n				\n				\n				\n																														\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Terms & Conditions		\n				\n				\n				\n							1) Registration – Limited slots are available on a first-come-first-served basis. 2) Consent to data collection – You consent for Maxwell Chambers and their partners to collect\, use and disclose the personal data that you provide in this form for marketing purposes\, including adding you to their mailing list for industry updates. The Organiser reserves the right to cancel or alter the content and timing of the programme or the identity of the speakers. In the event that the webinar is cancelled by the Organiser\, the participants will be notified prior to the webinar. 						\n				\n					\n		\n							\n		\n				\n						\n					\n			\n								\n				\n			Share		\n				\n				\n				\n					\n								\n						\n															\n																Share on facebook\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Facebook									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on twitter\n							\n																						\n																			\n										Twitter									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on linkedin\n							\n																						\n																			\n										LinkedIn									\n																	\n													\n					\n									\n						\n															\n																Share on whatsapp\n							\n																						\n																			\n										WhatsApp
URL:https://siac.mike-x.com/c1Mtw#new_tab
LOCATION:Singapore
CATEGORIES:Asia Pacific,Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.maxwellchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/YSIAC-Featured-Image.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR